Over the last couple of weeks, a lot of people have shown their true nature. Many have been trolling my comment section like a bunch of pre-pubescent gender neutral school children — others with tactical God complexes, have tried relegating me to nothing more than a talking monkey by throwing money at me challenging me to 2A tactical phallus-measuring contest.

Then there’s the Tactical boudoir IG “model” who thinks writing a lengthy Instagram message accusing me of not caring about A RIGHT I DEDICATED MY LIFE TO makes her ambiguity of cleavage IG page more relevant than the documented 12+ years of fighting for this right, 7 of which on the front line.

I’ve made my mental notes and placed these people in their appropriate boxes, and that’s the last I’ll speak of them.

I know there are genuine supporters who have questions about my stance on the bump stock debacle. I don’t owe anyone anything, the same way you all don’t owe me anything.

However, all things considered, many of you have supported me for years, and I appreciate and love you all for it. There’s a lot of people clout chasing and exploiting this bump stock mess to build personal brands, organizations and get donations. I can’t control that, but I can control the way I respond to it.

Below is a podcast I did over a year ago with Tavis Smiley. During this podcast, I gave my personal stance on bump stocks (nothing about my position has changed).

Colion Noir Bump Stock Excerpt The Tavis Smiley Podcast (1 Year Ago)
(Click Here For Full Podcast)

I’ve also included the NRA’s most recent statement (December 21, 2018) on bump stocks and the Comment’s submitted (June 18, 2018) by the NRA to the ATF explaining why the bump-stock did not meet the mechanical test standard necessary to re-classify the bump stock as a machine-gun.

I will always fight for this right the best way I know how, whether I have only 1 follower or 2 million followers.

The Pew Pew Life will forever and always be about THE PEOPLE (ThePPL).

NRA Statement on Bump Fire Stock Rule

FRIDAY, DECEMBER 21, 2018

This week, the Department of Justice announced that it would soon be releasing a final rule classifying “bump-stock-type-devices” as “machineguns” under the National Firearms Act.

These devices came to national attention in October 2017 after the horrific attack in Las Vegas.  As multiple media accounts correctly pointed to at the time, there was overwhelming legislative support for proposals that went far beyond these specific devices and some that could have potentially jeopardized all semiautomatic firearms. Rather than sit back and watch a legislative over-reaction, the NRA asked Congress to let ATF review its prior determinations on bump fire stocks.

Some have used our October 2017 statement to claim that NRA supports ATF’s final rule, but as NRA-ILA’s Executive Director Chris Cox noted only days after our statement was issued, “We don’t believe that bans have ever worked on anything.”

We also made this clear in our comments to ATF on the proposed rule earlier this year. In our comments, we further advised that ATF should at a minimum make an amnesty period available to deal with the fundamental inequity imposed on law-abiding gun owners who purchased their bump fire stocks in good faith reliance on prior ATF determinations. We continue to pursue the availability of a period of amnesty with the administration.

While there can be disagreement on legislative strategy, it’s important to remember that we will soon face a hostile, anti-gun Congress led by Nancy Pelosi. It’s critical that all gun owners unite and prevent the Bloomberg-bought Congress from dismantling our Second Amendment freedom.

Click Below to see comment’s submitted (June 18, 2018) by the NRA to the ATF explaining why the bump-stock did not meet the mechanical test standard necessary to re-classify the bump stock as a machine-gun.

View Comments